Sibling survey
Jun. 16th, 2013 10:37 pmThe recent Very (Un)Scientific Survey produced pretty unremarkable results in terms of whether or not character preferences were influenced by having younger or older siblings - unsurprisingly (though I admit to being a little hopeful that there was some pattern).
What is a little bit interesting is the number of participants who are the eldest.
Participants and their sibling relationships:

Of the 81 participants just over half had younger siblings. Unfortunately I can't make a sweeping statement regarding the demographic of Supernatural watchers from such a small sample of fans. I am sure this says more about my flist than anything else (though it would be totally cool to find out if this small sample was representative of SPN fans. I wonder what that would say about SPN watchers and being the eldest in the family).
As to whether your character preferences are determined by if you have older, younger or no siblings I think we can pretty confidently say there is no relationship whatsoever.
All the categories (Dean, Sam or Bi!bro) had majority of the eldest sibling.
Dean people: 55%
Sam people: 57%
Bi bro: 44%
(ETA: Poll results have changed - due to more participants. Though the trend still holds)
For full results check out the Poll.
In the comments most people agreed that even though they had leanings toward one brother they are essentially bi bro. A few ticked each box, arguing that their preference changed as the season progressed. Or felt it fluctuated.
I'm not sure if a full demographic survey of SPN fans has even been done. I know some media have referred to fans as "14 year old girls" - which feels completely off the mark to me. But that's probably just the circles I keep (and looking at con attendees). There may well be as many 14 year olds as 25, 34, 49 or 66 year olds - (with an even spread of older, younger or no siblings).
Determining what makes someone lean to either Sam or Dean might just need to be filed in the too hard basket...;)
What is a little bit interesting is the number of participants who are the eldest.
Participants and their sibling relationships:

Of the 81 participants just over half had younger siblings. Unfortunately I can't make a sweeping statement regarding the demographic of Supernatural watchers from such a small sample of fans. I am sure this says more about my flist than anything else (though it would be totally cool to find out if this small sample was representative of SPN fans. I wonder what that would say about SPN watchers and being the eldest in the family).
As to whether your character preferences are determined by if you have older, younger or no siblings I think we can pretty confidently say there is no relationship whatsoever.
All the categories (Dean, Sam or Bi!bro) had majority of the eldest sibling.
Dean people: 55%
Sam people: 57%
Bi bro: 44%
(ETA: Poll results have changed - due to more participants. Though the trend still holds)
For full results check out the Poll.
In the comments most people agreed that even though they had leanings toward one brother they are essentially bi bro. A few ticked each box, arguing that their preference changed as the season progressed. Or felt it fluctuated.
I'm not sure if a full demographic survey of SPN fans has even been done. I know some media have referred to fans as "14 year old girls" - which feels completely off the mark to me. But that's probably just the circles I keep (and looking at con attendees). There may well be as many 14 year olds as 25, 34, 49 or 66 year olds - (with an even spread of older, younger or no siblings).
Determining what makes someone lean to either Sam or Dean might just need to be filed in the too hard basket...;)
no subject
Date: 2013-06-16 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-17 10:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-16 04:05 pm (UTC)I do think there are plenty of teenagers in SPN fandom, but I don't think the majority are 14 by any way of calculating. My guess is that different niches of fandom draw a different demographic, so it depends on 'where' you're looking, whether it's an online space or a 'real life' one.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-17 10:21 am (UTC)And I am totally fascinated by sibling relationship and spn watchers. I'd love to be able to broaden the survey to see if the trend continues.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-16 05:45 pm (UTC)And, yeah, I certainly was expected to "set an example" and I was the one expected to be responsible and act mature. At 12, I was also given the caregiver responsibility of my 8 year old sister and newborn brother because both of my parents worked, though I do remember being that person long before my brother was born.
I didn't mean to go into a life history and all but, given all of that, you'd think I'd lean more towards Dean. (And like most fans, I'm a Samgirl by the narrowest of narrow margins.) I do "get" Dean more easily and all he has to do is cry the one manly tear and I'll forgive him of most anything. His scenes after Cold Oak, sitting next to his dead brother, break my heart into tiny little shards every single time I watch them. And, I don't know why Sam's arc draws me in a little bit more. At first I thought it was because of the pilot and Jessica and, yeah, I can relate to that sort of loss on a personal level. But then I kept leaning towards his character.
For many years I've tried to figure out some sort of pattern to the characters I gravitate towards and even though, sometimes, I can see certain similarities in the character type it's never really cut and dried.
As for fangirls, and even fanboys, the media tends to stereotype. Badly. So, I pay no attention to anything they say.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-18 09:59 am (UTC)And wow - that sounds like a big responsibility for a 12 year old. I imagine it makes someone grow up very quickly.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-16 08:39 pm (UTC)yeah, i'm a Sam girl because he's just so tortured (not that Dean doesn't do tortured just as well...) and i think for me it's more a maternal thing than a sibling thing.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-18 10:01 am (UTC)xx
no subject
Date: 2013-06-17 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-17 11:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-18 08:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-17 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-18 10:05 am (UTC)