You learn something every day..
Oct. 7th, 2010 04:08 pmSlash--the homosexualization of a relationship between two characters who do not have a sexual relationship with one another in canon (taken from some interesting meta found here)
I would say that I should be ashamed not to know the actual meaning of the word, but really I came into fandom pretty naive in the ways of slash. Well, let's say completely innocent in fact. I mean, I know what I'm in for when I read slash, I just didn't know the "canon" part.
I remember my very first encounter with the notion that Sam and Dean could be written has having sex together as totally WTF! How dare anybody do that!! It didn't make a lot of sense to me and well, I did some reading and..., let's say I have been (deliciously) corrupted. *G*
Anyway... that's probably by the by, what is interesting is the linked meta. It's interesting to me that as much as I can read and enjoy slash I rarely view the actual show that way. I mean, sure there are moments that could be considered "slashy" and sometimes I think the producers chuck that in there to mess with us but for fans to begrudge either Sam or Dean a sexual relationship with someone (in the show) because it would mean they the couldn't have that with each other seems kinda strange. In the show they don't have that with each other. We can imagine they do (for those who wish to) but they are actually brothers who have a very special, loving, non-sexual relationship. (I know. Shock! *g*)
Anyway
cagedwriter61 makes some interesting points and I suspect it will be stir up some controversy. Especially why slashers slash (well, that bit did for me). I suspect (as with anything fandom), viewpoints will vary differently. But that's good. \o/
(You can tell I'm on holiday because I'm blabbing a lot - and probably not making much sense either).
Right, of to do some coaching.
I would say that I should be ashamed not to know the actual meaning of the word, but really I came into fandom pretty naive in the ways of slash. Well, let's say completely innocent in fact. I mean, I know what I'm in for when I read slash, I just didn't know the "canon" part.
I remember my very first encounter with the notion that Sam and Dean could be written has having sex together as totally WTF! How dare anybody do that!! It didn't make a lot of sense to me and well, I did some reading and..., let's say I have been (deliciously) corrupted. *G*
Anyway... that's probably by the by, what is interesting is the linked meta. It's interesting to me that as much as I can read and enjoy slash I rarely view the actual show that way. I mean, sure there are moments that could be considered "slashy" and sometimes I think the producers chuck that in there to mess with us but for fans to begrudge either Sam or Dean a sexual relationship with someone (in the show) because it would mean they the couldn't have that with each other seems kinda strange. In the show they don't have that with each other. We can imagine they do (for those who wish to) but they are actually brothers who have a very special, loving, non-sexual relationship. (I know. Shock! *g*)
Anyway
(You can tell I'm on holiday because I'm blabbing a lot - and probably not making much sense either).
Right, of to do some coaching.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 08:24 am (UTC)The "why slash" question is an often asked and discussed question. I think its sort of like - why do you like blue over red, or why do you like alpha versus beta heroes in your books - there won't be one answer that fits all and some if it is a pure and simple "just because."
Still, it is always an interesting question!
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 11:25 am (UTC)And yes. I didn't really want to weigh in on any major discussion because each to their own and that stuff can start to get quite personal and heated and I just can't do that. *runs* I did find it interesting reading though.
<33
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 11:33 am (UTC)Two different experiences, absolutely. And if I want slashy tv/vid - I go to your and other vids and woo hoo, there it is ::grins:: Best of both worlds.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 11:39 am (UTC)I very rarely say anything and yet here I am... :D
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 08:42 am (UTC)It's pretty much the same for me with most shows I watch.
Though I thought long before I ever learned that there is the term "slash" which stands for a certain concept that Jack and Daniel kinda belong together :)
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 11:29 am (UTC)Wow, that was long winded. Sorry about that.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 05:20 pm (UTC)I don't know if this makes sense, but it's interesting to try to put this in writing :) Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 09:29 am (UTC)SAME HEREEEEE! LMAO!
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 11:30 am (UTC)I have the feeling we might not be the only ones... :D :D
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 09:39 am (UTC)Pretty sure most slashing is not writers trying to 'elevate' what they see as a relationship missing something but more because the porn is fun to imagine.
The Lisa hate (which I've only heard about and not read) is a very myopic view in my opinion and is again nothing surprising from the 'fundamentalist sector of spn fandom' as I like to refer to them. I honestly don't think the writers are ever going to let any relationship usurp the brother one so I have no problems acknowledging that as a character Lisa has a helluva lot going for her and that I am quite easily a fan of hers. I worry for her future (as anyone would who has even an inkling of female characters and the track record of Spn) but in the meantime I'll just enjoy the interactions she has, especially with Dean and hope for the best outcome - Lisa and Ben being regulars in the Boys lives as they get on with being Sam&Dean. So long as they hurry up and start fixing things.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 11:36 am (UTC)Exactly. I had trouble with that. I mean... wow... Sam and Dean sure do have heaps going wrong in their relationship at the moment but having sex sure ain't gonna fix that! Though I understand that it gives writers a field day, but as I said to her, it's just context not the true belief that everything would be better if they had sex.
fundamentalist sector of spn fandom'
HA!! Oh yes. And luckily I've only heard about the haters not actually come across any. In fact I hear nothing but love for her.
So long as they hurry up and start fixing things.
AMEN SISTER!!
And only one day left!! Arghhh... I wants more....
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 10:10 am (UTC)*blush* yessum!
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 11:41 am (UTC)(and just between you and me... it's made for a nice improvement in...well... some *koff* other areas in my life. But I said that very quietly.
xx
no subject
Date: 2010-10-08 10:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 10:22 am (UTC)Well, I wouldn't be too upset about it because it's just one definition of slash and not the most commonly accepted one (also, the wording is very strange. o_O "Homosexualization" of a relationship? Really?). For example, there is a lot of Queer as Folk slash and Willow/Tara on BtVS is femslash. For a better definition, history of the term, history of the genre, etc. see Slash (http://fanlore.org/wiki/Slash).
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 11:19 am (UTC)Thank you very much. I once warned for slash for brian/Justin and was told if they exist as lovers in canon then it isn't slash. I took that on board and assumed that was true so when I saw that definition above it made some sense to me.
Though your link was interesting too and it seems there's some variations on what could be considered slash. But thank you so much. I certainly know more now. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 11:10 am (UTC)I seem to have a kind of wall in my brain that keeps the slash out of the show for me while I do enjoy reading slash fanfic now and then. It's like a different world.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 11:42 am (UTC)<33
no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 02:17 pm (UTC)"I remember my very first encounter with the notion that Sam and Dean could be written has having sex together as totally WTF! How dare anybody do that!! It didn't make a lot of sense to me and well, I did some reading and..., let's say I have been (deliciously) corrupted. *G*"
I had a similar experience. 'Cept it wasn't with SPN. By the time SPN came along I was already corrupted...or I should say I found SPN via slash. My WTF experience was with the "original" slash-inspiring show Star Trek. Only it was 40 years after the slash phenomenon started. I accidently came across slash Star Trek fanfiction online and I went O.o Then when I found it existed for Kirk & Spock--*that* was my WTF moment. Like "how dare!" anyone mess with the sacred Kirk & Spock relationship??!!! Um....yeah, then I was corrupted.
But I also have these partitions in my head. There's canon (for any shows) and then there's fanfiction. Canon fuels the imagination, but then the imagination can go ANYWHERE. And that's what is so marvelous about fanfiction. No Rules.
Um. Wow, this was a longer comment than I intended. *runs off to work*
no subject
Date: 2010-10-08 01:22 am (UTC)Hee! I am always getting caught up on here just before I have to dash to work..
Canon fuels the imagination, but then the imagination can go ANYWHERE. And that's what is so marvelous about fanfiction. No Rules.
Word! I only discovered that there was even a thing called fanfiction when I started seriously fanning Supernatural. I had no idea the extent in which is exists. Wish I had discovered it ages ago...:)
It took a little while to get into the slash (and there are so many partnerships that I can't even go there with - like S&H (even though they are soooo slash worthy) ), but once I took that leap with Sam and Dean...well, let's say I've never turned back. I attribute that to the amazing writers we have.
xx
no subject
Date: 2010-10-10 04:41 pm (UTC)As I also ship canon slash pairings, I'd beg to differ when it comes to that definition, though.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-11 11:09 am (UTC)The definition was one I hadn't heard and I assume it was correct - though having done some reading it seems to be open to interpretation a bit.
xx